Medal v. Amazon.com Servs. LLC, No. 2:23-cv-01975-JHC (Western District of Wash. (W.D. WASH) 2026)

Case details
Full caption
ANITA MEDAL v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
Western District of Washington (W.D. WASH)
Decided
2026
Majority
John H. Chun (J.) (unanimous Court)
ORDER GRANTING AMAZON’S MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - 1 (No. 2:23-cv-01975-JHC) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ANITA MEDAL, ESTHER YOO, GAYLE HAYES and ANTOINETTE STANIEWICZ, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC, Defendant. No. 2:23-cv-01975-JHC ORDER GRANTING AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC’S MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Case 2:23-cv-01975-JHC Document 129 Filed 03/04/26 Page 1 of 2
ORDER GRANTING AMAZON’S MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - 2 (No. 2:23-cv-01975-JHC) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Having considered Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC’s Motion for Order to Show Cause, Dkt. # 124, and all papers filed in support of and in opposition thereto, the Court GRANTS the Motion and ORDERS Plaintiffs’ counsel to explain: (1) each signatory’s role in the use of the “juxtaposed” language and accompanying false citation in Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Stay (Dkt. No. 122) (“Opposition”); (2) whether and how the drafting or research for the Opposition was aided by the use of generative AI; and (3) what verification mechanisms were in place for use of generative AI. This explanation must be filed on or before March 18, 2026. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 4th day of March, 2026. _ JOHN H. CHUN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 2:23-cv-01975-JHC Document 129 Filed 03/04/26 Page 2 of 2
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access