United States v. Klaes, 453 F.2d 1375 (5th Cir. 1972)
Case details
Full caption
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alan KLAES, Defendant-Appellant.
PER CURIAM:
Klaes’ sole contention is that only hearsay evidence was presented to the grand jury, and therefore the indictment should have been dismissed. This contention is without merit. See Costello v. United States, 350 U.S. 359, 76 S.Ct. 406, 100 L.Ed. 397 (1956); United States v. Gower, 447 F.2d 187 (5th Cir. 1971). The judgment is
Affirmed.
*
Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York, 431 F.2d 409, Part I (5th Cir. 1970).