Murph v. State, 370 So. 2d 68 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App., Second District 1979)
Case details
Full caption
Calvin E. MURPH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Court
Florida District Courts of Appeal, Second District
Panel
Hobson (J.); Scheb (J.)
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant’s conviction, but we remand the case so that the trial court may set aside the orders assessing costs against appellant. Since the court had adjudged appellant to be insolvent, it was not authorized to assess costs against him. § 939.15, Fla.Stat. (1977); Cox v. State, 334 So.2d 568 (Fla.1976).
GRIMES, C. J„ and HOBSON and SCHEB, JJ., concur.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access