Doc
Post
E-signatures
PlayMaker
Second Chair
Verbatim
Sign in
→
Request access
In re Miller
(2026)
Case details
Full caption
IN RE PAULA M. MILLER, Relator
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Texas (TX)
Court
Texas Supreme Court
Decided
2026
IN
RE
PAULA
M.
MILLER,
Relator,
Not
Reported
in
S.W.
Rptr.
(2026)
©
2026
Thomson
Reuters.
No
claim
to
original
U.S.
Government
Works.
1
2026
WL
1137938
Only
the
Westlaw
citation
is
currently
available.
SEE
TX
R
RAP
RULE
47.2
FOR
DESIGNATION
AND
SIGNING
OF
OPINIONS.
Court
of
Appeals
of
Texas,
Dallas.
IN
RE
PAULA
M.
MILLER,
Relator
NO.
01-26-00319-CV
|
Opinion
issued
April
23,
2026
Original
Proceeding
on
Petition
for
Writ
of
Mandamus
Panel
consists
of
Chief
Justice
Adams
and
Justices
Caughey
and
Morgan
.
Adams
,
C.J.,
concurring.
CONCURRING
OPINION
Terry
Adams
Chief
Justice
*1
I
write
separately
to
note
that
the
mandamus
petition
here
has
attributions
and
quotations
to
caselaw
which
strongly
appear
to
be
AI-fabricated
hallucinations.
Filing
a
document
in
our
Court
with
fictitious
or
misleading
citations—whether
generated
by
AI
and
not
checked
by
a
human,
or
otherwise—
is
a
serious
breach
of
candor
that
this
Court
cannot
tolerate.
See
TEX.
R.
APP.
P.
38.1
,
38.9
;
Schlafly
v.
Schlafly
,
33
S.W.3d
863,
873
(Tex.
App.—Houston
[14th
Dist.]
2000,
pet.
denied)
.
“Citing
nonexistent
case
law
or
misrepresenting
the
holdings
of
a
case
is
making
a
false
statement
to
a
court.
It
does
not
matter
if
[generative
AI]
told
you
so.”
United
States
v.
Hayes
,
763
F.
Supp.
3d
1054,
1067
(E.D.
Cal.
2025)
(quoting
Maura
R.
Grossman,
Paul
W.
Grimm,
&
Daniel
G.
Brown,
Is
Disclosure
and
Certification
of
the
Use
of
Generative
AI
Really
Necessary?
,
107
Judicature
68,
75
(2023)
).
Counsel
who
appear
before
this
Court
and
use
AI
for
legal
research
must
do
so
with
great
care.
Always
“trust
and
verify”
the
accuracy
and
validity
of
your
results.
Trusting
AI
for
legal
research
without
verifying
that
the
cases
actually
contain
quoted
language
and
stand
for
the
proposition
for
which
they
are
cited
violates
counsel's
ethical
duty
to
this
Court.
And
that
unfortunately
will
require
the
Court
to
take
the
necessary
corrective
action
including,
but
not
limited
to,
striking
the
offending
brief
and
reporting
counsel
to
the
State
Bar.
All
Citations
Not
Reported
in
S.W.
Rptr.,
2026
WL
1137938
End
of
Document
©
2026
Thomson
Reuters.
No
claim
to
original
U.S.
Government
Works.
Provenance
Know exactly where this document came from.
Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.
Request access