In re Romeu (Dec. 16, 2025)

Case details
Full caption
In re Ricardo Andres Romeu
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Texas (TX)
Court
Texas Supreme Court
Decided
Dec. 16, 2025
Disposition
Petition Denied
© 2025 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.IN RE RICARDO ANDRES ROMEU, RelatorCourt of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). | December 16, 2025 | Not Reported in S.W. Rptr. |2025 WL 3639450Document Detailsstandard Citation:In re Romeu, No. 14-25-01061-CR, 2025 WL 3639450 (Tex. App. Dec.16, 2025)All Citations:Not Reported in S.W. Rptr., 2025 WL 3639450Search DetailsSearch Query:adv: (openai "artificial intelligence" chatgpt "google gemini" "westlawcocounsel" "large language model") (hallucinat! fake fictitious spuriousnonexistent "non-existent" "made up" imagined /p (gpt ai "artificialintelligence" chatgpt chaton perplexity openai copilot "google gemini""google bard" grok "mata v. avianca" claude llm llms)) (hallucinat! fakefictitious spurious nonexistent "non-existent" "made up" imagined) +3(precedent case "legal authority" "legal case") & DATE(aft 1/1/2023)Jurisdiction:TexasDelivery DetailsDate:December 19, 2025 at 10:34 AMDelivered By: Client ID:NOCLIENTIDOutlineMEMORANDUMOPINION (p.1)All Citations (p.1)
IN RE RICARDO ANDRES ROMEU, Relator, Not Reported in S.W. Rptr. (2025) © 2025 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.12025 WL 3639450Only the Westlaw citation is currently available.SEE TX R RAP RULE 47.2 FORDESIGNATION AND SIGNING OF OPINIONS.Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.).IN RE RICARDOANDRES ROMEU, RelatorNO. 14-25-01061-CR|Memorandum Opinion filed December 16, 2025ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGWRIT OF MANDAMUS25th District CourtColorado County, TexasTrial Court Cause No. CR 22-220Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher, JusticesWilson and Bridges.MEMORANDUM OPINIONPER CURIAM*1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied andMemorandum Opinion filed December 16, 2025.On December 2, 2025, relator Ricardo Andres Romeufiled a petition for writ of mandamus. Relator asksthis court to compel the trial court to rule onall pending motions, including relator's November19, 2025 motion to vacate judgment and declarecommunity supervision void, among other requests.Relator has not demonstrated entitlement to mandamusrelief. As such, we deny the petition for writ ofmandamus.Further, the court is aware that relator's brief includesa citation to a non-existent case. Relator is put onnotice that he may face sanctions in the future forciting false caselaw. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.11(a)(“On motion of any party or on its own initiative, thecourt may--after notice and a reasonable opportunity torespond--impose just sanctions on a party or attorneywho is not acting in good faith as indicated by anyof the following... filing a petition that is clearlygroundless.”).All CitationsNot Reported in S.W. Rptr., 2025 WL 3639450End of Document© 2025 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S.Government Works.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access